Multidisciplinary expert consensus statements and recommendations for use of hypochlorous acid as a solution for negative pressure wound therapy with instillation.

BACKGROUND: HOCl (eg, pHAp) preserved solutions have antimicrobial properties and are considered safe and effective for wound management. NPWTi-d (or NPWTi) is an established adjunctive wound modality for a variety of wound etiologies in various anatomic locations in which an instillate solution dwells on the surface of the wound to assist in wound bed preparation. A variety of solutions have been used, including 0.9% normal saline wound cleansers and antiseptics. pHAp is growing in popularity as the solution of choice for NPWTi-d. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate consensus statements on the use of NPWTi-d with pHAp. METHODS: A 15-member multidisciplinary panel of expert clinicians in the United States, Canada, and France convened in person in April 2023 in Washington, D.C. and/or corresponded later to discuss 10 statements on the use of pHAp with NPWTi-d. The panelists then replied "agree" or "disagree" to each statement and had the option to provide comments. RESULTS: Ten consensus statements are presented, along with the proportion of agreement or disagreement and summary comments. Although agreement with the statements on NPWTi-d with pHAp varied, the statements appear to reflect individual preferences for use rather than concerns about safety or efficacy. CONCLUSION: The consensus indicates that NPWTi-d with pHAp can have a beneficial effect in wound care.

Consensus recommendations for optimizing the use of intact fish skin graft in the management of acute and chronic lower extremity wounds.

BACKGROUND: Since 2017, the clinical use of IFSG has increased substantially in the United States, with some use in Europe and Asia as well. However, scant consensus data have been published on such use. OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to develop consensus recommendations for the clinical use of IFSG in the management of acute and chronic LEWs. METHODS: A panel of 8 expert clinicians in the United States used a 2-cycle NFG process to develop consensus statements based on their own clinical practice and the literature. At their initial meeting in October 2021, panel members discussed the management of DFUs, VLUs, atypical LEWs, and traumatic LEWs in their practices. Consensus statements were drafted, voted on, and rated by relative importance. At the second meeting in October 2022, the panel discussed the initial survey results; a second survey was conducted, and panel members revised the recommendations and indicated the relative importance of each in the final report. A systematic literature review of English-language articles published from January 2016 through November 2022 was conducted as well, using the search terms: "fish skin," "piscine graft," "fish tissue," "intact fish skin graft," "Cod skin," "Omega 3 fatty acid graft." RESULTS: Forty-three statements were generated and grouped into 5 sections comprising general recommendations for LEWs and recommendations specific to DFUs, VLUs, atypical LEWs, and traumatic LEWs. The primary general recommendation is the need to determine wound etiology based on clinical evaluation and reviewing related test results. For DFUs and VLUs, the main recommendations are to adhere to first-line therapy (ie, standard of care, follow conventional guidelines [multilayer compression therapy], offloading, and assessment of wound perfusion) before introducing IFSG. CONCLUSIONS: Publications on and clinical experience in the use of IFSGs have increased substantially in the past several years. The 43 consensus recommendations are meant to guide physicians in the optimal use of IFSG in the management of acute and chronic LEWs.

Infection and Inflammation in the Wound Environment: Addressing Issues of Delayed Wound Healing With Advanced Wound Dressings.

Impaired wound healing is estimated to affect about 2% of the US population, and a major goal of health care providers (HCPs) is to better understand delayed healing so they can effectively choose advanced wound dressings to manage these wounds. However, there are estimated to be more than 3000 dressing options available, making dressing selection an overwhelming burden. An expert panel of 7 HCPs experienced in diverse medical disciplines and 3 scientists convened to discuss the use of 2 families of dressings (silver-oxysalt [AgOx] dressings and oxidized regenerated cellulose/collagen [ORC/C] dressings) and delayed wound healing. Before the meeting, panelists reviewed 16 articles concerning the dressings, and 2 scientists presented on the topics of infection and inflammation in the wound environment, along with providing information about the dressing families, during the meeting. In addition, each HCP presented specific cases in which they had applied AgOx or ORC/C dressings and described how the dressing was used to manage stalled healing. After the meeting, the panelists and another HCP who was unable to attend the panel meeting provided insight and feedback for this publication, which provides an overview of the meeting. A major theme of this panel discussion was the need for a fundamental change in how HCPs approach wound care, especially for nonhealing wounds and underlying issues of infection and inflammation in the wound environment. Ultimately, the panel developed a decision-tree model for risk-stratifying patients based on their potential to have or develop these 2 underlying issues, followed by deciding on treatment options based on the status of infection and inflammation in the wound.

Use of mechanically powered disposable negative pressure wound therapy: recommendations and reimbursement update.

Use of ultra-portable, mechanically powered disposable negative pressure wound therapy (dNPWT) has grown as an adjunctive modality to manage wounds in outpatient care and to expedite transition of inpatients to an outpatient setting. This technology has demonstrated similar efficacy and usability for mobile outpatients when compared with electrically powered negative pressure wound therapy devices. It was designed for patients with smaller, low to moderately exudating wounds and does not require batteries or a power source. However, very few studies address best practices for using dNPWT in a variety of wound types. There is a need for comprehensive clinical recommendations to better direct clinicians and patients in using this therapy. In addition, it is critical that providers are knowledgeable about processes for obtaining reimbursement for placement of dNPWT since codes and procedures differ drastically from standard NPWT. A panel meeting of experts with a high level of experience with dNPWT in varied wound types was convened to develop clinical recommendations and summarize current US reimbursement coding guidelines for the use of dNPWT. This publication summarizes the recommendations from panel members, in addition to supporting evidence, to help guide appropriate use of dNPWT. Panel recommendations regarding optimal patient and wound selection, wound preparation, proper patient training, and use of dNPWT in various wound types are included as well as clinical techniques for dressing application, bridging under offloading devices and compression, maintaining a seal, and protecting intact skin. Processes and codes for obtaining reimbursement for dNPWT are reviewed by care setting. Clinical recommendations and reimbursement guidelines summarized in this publication are meant to provide direction to clinicians in using dNPWT that potentially could translate into improved clinical and economic value.